home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
Text File | 1992-04-21 | 32.8 KB | 1,165 lines |
-
-
- ORDER LIST
-
- MONDAY, APRIL 20, 1992
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION
-
- 89-1681 BD. OF ED. OF TOPEKA, ETC. V. BROWN, OLIVER
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Freeman v. Pitts, 503
-
- U.S. ____ (1992) and Board of Education of Oklahoma
-
- City Public Schools, Independent School District No. 80,
-
- Oklahoma County, Oklahoma v. Dowell, 498 U.S. ____
-
- (1991).
-
- 90-1527 UNITED STATES V. CALDERONE, CLAUDIO, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
-
- for further consideraton in light of United States v.
-
- Felix, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).
-
- 91-31 UNITED STATES V. GAMBINO, GIUSEPPE
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of United States v.
-
- Felix, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).
-
- 91-900 CASPARI, PAUL, ET AL. V. McINTYRE, DIR., MISSOURI DIV.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
-
- for further consideration in light of United States v.
-
- Felix, 503 U.S. ____ (1992).
-
- 91-1340 DENNLER, WILLIAM, ET AL. V. TRIPPET, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.
-
- The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the
-
- United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit for
-
- further consideration in light of Section 27 of the
-
- Securities and Exchange Act of 1934. Justice Thomas took
-
- no part in the consideration or decision of this case.
-
-
-
- ORDERS IN PENDING CASES
-
- No. --- PAUL CARROLL, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- that does not conform with the Rules of this Court is
-
- denied.
-
- No. --- PATRICIA JOHN V. NORTH COMMUNITY BANK, ET AL.
-
- The motion to direct the Clerk to file a petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari, out-of-time, is denied.
-
- No. --- WILLIAM B. SCHMIDT V. DEE ANN RANSONE SCHMIDT
-
- The motion to dispense with printing the petition
-
- for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- A-702 JOHN F. FREAS V. NEW JERSEY
-
- The application for stay addressed to Justice White
-
- and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- A-718 MARIA LUISA CONSTALL GAYDOS V. TIMOTHY J. GAYDOS, ET AL.
-
- The application for stay addressed to the Chief
-
- Justice and referred to the Court is denied.
-
- D-1078 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MELVILLE HERMAN BEHRENDT, JR.
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Melville
-
- Herman Behrendt, Jr., of Alameda, California, has
-
- resigned from the practice of law before the Supreme
-
- Court of California and this Court by order of January
-
- 21, 1992, having suspended the said Melville Herman
-
- Behrendt, Jr., from the practice of law in this Court
-
- and directed that a rule issue requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly
-
- issued;
-
- It is ordered that the said Melville Herman
-
- Behrendt, Jr., be disbarred from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that his name be stricken from the roll
-
- of attorneys admitted to practice before the Bar of this
-
- Court.
-
- D-1081 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF MICHAEL J. STELLA
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Michael
-
- J. Stella, of Harrison, New York, has been disbarred
-
- from the practice of law by the Appellate Division,
-
- Supreme Court of New York, Second Judicial Department,
-
- and this Court by order of February 24, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Michael J. Stella from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Michael J. Stella be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1082 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF LAWRENCE WAYNE SOLODKY
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Lawrence
-
- Wayne Solodky, of Longwood, Florida, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Florida
-
- and this Court by order of February 24, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Lawrence Wayne Solodky from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and directed that a rule
-
- issue requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Lawrence Wayne Solodky
-
- be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1083 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HAROLD JACK GATTSEK
-
- It having been reported to the Court that Harold
-
- Jack Gattsek, of Annandale, Virginia, has resigned from
-
- the practice of law before the Supreme Court of Virginia
-
- and this Court by order of February 24, 1992, having
-
- suspended the said Harold Jack Gattsek from the practice
-
- of law in this Court and directed that a rule issue
-
- requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred;
-
- And it appearing that the said rule was duly issued
-
- and served upon the respondent and that the time to file
-
- a response has expired;
-
- It is ordered that the said Harold Jack Gattsek be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court and
-
- that his name be stricken from the roll of attorneys
-
- admitted to practice before the Bar of this Court.
-
- D-1109 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF DANIEL V. PRESNICK
-
- It is ordered that Daniel V. Presnick, of Orange,
-
- Connecticut, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1110 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF PHIL L. HANSEN
-
- It is ordered that Phil L. Hansen, of Salt Lake
-
- City, Utah, be suspended from the practice of law in
-
- this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring him to show cause why he should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1111 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HARVEY TESSLER
-
- It is ordered that Harvey Tessler, of St. Louis,
-
- Missouri, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1112 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF IVAN VANCE WHITE, JR.
-
- It is ordered that Ivan Vance White, Jr., of
-
- Wilmington, North Carolina, be suspended from the
-
- practice of law in this Court and that a rule issue,
-
- returnable within forty days, requiring him to show
-
- cause why he should not be disbarred from the practice
-
- of law in this Court.
-
- D-1113 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF HILTON DAVIS
-
- It is ordered that Hilton Davis, of Newark, New
-
- Jersey, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1114 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF GLADYS E. HARRISON
-
- It is ordered that Gladys E. Harrison, of
-
- Cleveland, Ohio, be suspended from the practice of law
-
- in this Court and that a rule issue, returnable within
-
- forty days, requiring her to show cause why she should
-
- not be disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- D-1115 IN THE MATTER OF DISBARMENT OF JOHN B. D'ALBORA
-
- It is ordered that John B. D'Albora, of Brooklyn,
-
- New York, be suspended from the practice of law in this
-
- Court and that a rule issue, returnable within forty
-
- days, requiring him to show cause why he should not be
-
- disbarred from the practice of law in this Court.
-
- 108 ORIG. NEBRASKA V. WYOMING, ET AL.
-
- The sixth motion of the Special Master for
-
- compensation and reimbursement of expenses is granted
-
- and the Special Master is awarded a total of
-
- $233,144.11. Assessment of this award is deferred
-
- pending receipt of further responses by Colorado and
-
- the amici curiae to the special assessment proposed
-
- by the Special Master, to be filed on or before
-
- Monday, May 4, 1992, and further order of the Court.
-
- 91-744 ) PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA V. CASEY, ROBERT P., ET AL.
- )
- 91-902 ) CASEY, ROBERT P., ET AL. V. PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SE PA
-
- The motion of James J. Crook for leave to file a
-
- brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motion of America
-
- 21, Family Values for the Twenty-First Century for leave
-
- to file a brief as amicus curiae is denied. The motion
-
- of Arlen Specter to join amici curiae brief of Don
-
- Edwards, et al. is granted.
-
- 91-913 PATTERSON, JOHN V. SHUMATE, JOSEPH
-
- The motion of Hallmark Cards, Inc. for leave to
-
- file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of
-
- Wal-Mart Stores, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted. The motion of Eldon S. Reed for
-
- leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The
-
- motion of Ronald J. Wyles, et al. for leave to file a
-
- brief as amici curiae is granted. The motion of ERISA
-
- Industry Committee, et al. for leave to file a brief as
-
- amici curiae is granted. The motion of Lincoln National
-
- Corporation for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae
-
- is granted. The motion of American Society of Pension
-
- Actuaries for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is
-
- granted. The motion of Chamber of Commerce of the United
-
- States of America for leave to file a brief as amicus
-
- curiae is granted. The motion of American College of
-
- Trust and Estate Counsel for leave to file a brief as
-
- amicus curiae is granted.
-
- 91-1208 DRILAKE FARMS, INC., ET AL. V. SURRILLO, JULIO, ET AL.
-
- 91-1353 CONROY, THOMAS F. V. ANISKOFF, WALTER, ET AL.
-
- The Solicitor General is invited to file briefs in
-
- these cases expressing the views of the United States.
-
- 91-1502 FRANKLIN, SEC. OF COMMERCE V. MASSACHUSETTS, ET AL.
-
- The motion of Attorney General of Washington for
-
- leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae,
-
- for divided argument and for additional time for oral
-
- argument is denied.
-
- 91-1618 VOINOVICH, GOV. OF OHIO V. QUILTER, BARNEY
- (A-693)
- The application to stay an order of the United
-
- States District Court for the Northern District of
-
- Ohio, filed March 17, 1992 and supplemented April 6,
-
- 1992, presented to Justice Stevens and by him referred
-
- to the Court is granted and it is ordered that the
-
- orders of the United States District Court for the
-
- Northern District of Ohio, case No. 5:91 CV 2219,
-
- entered March 10, 1992 and March 31, 1992 are stayed
-
- pending final disposition of the appeal by this Court.
-
- 91-6854 INGALLS, ROBERT G. V. ROOSEVELT CTY., NEW MEXICO, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of
-
- order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is
-
- denied. Justice Blackmun and Justice Stevens would grant
-
- this motion.
-
- 91-7325 DEMOS, JOHN R. V. SUP. CT. OF WASHINGTON
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until May 11, 1992, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Stevens would deny the petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari.
-
- 91-7376 McDONALD, JESSIE D. V. YELLOW CAB METRO, INC., ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. See Rule 39.8. Petitioner is
-
- allowed until May 11, 1992, within which to pay the
-
- docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a
-
- petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this
-
- Court. Justice Stevens would deny the petition for a
-
- writ of certiorari.
-
- 91-7377 MOOYMAN, JOHANNES G. V. WCAB, ET AL.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- May 11, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 39(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- 91-7504 DAS, PRIYA K. V. A. W. CHESTERTON CO.
-
- The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is denied. Petitioner is allowed until
-
- May 11, 1992, within which to pay the docketing fee
-
- required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in
-
- compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
-
- Justice Stevens, dissenting: For the reasons expressed
-
- in Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., 464 U.S. 928 (1983), I
-
- would deny the petition for a writ of certiorari without
-
- reaching the merits of the motion to proceed in forma
-
- pauperis.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI GRANTED
-
- 91-1030 WITHROW, PAMELA V. WILLIAMS, ROBERT
-
- The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of
-
- certiorari is granted.
-
-
-
- CERTIORARI DENIED
-
- 90-1801 BOSTON TEACHERS UNION V. MORGAN, TALLULAH, ET AL.
-
- 90-1824 PALOMAR MOBILEHOME PARK ASSN. V. SAN MARCOS, CALIFORNIA
-
- 90-8394 MUNERA-CADAVID, ABELARDO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-631 CASELLA, ROBERT, ET AL. V. CITY OF MORGAN HILL
-
- 91-934 LADNER, THOMAS E. V. SMITH, SHERIFF, ET AL,
-
- 91-987 CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO V. FAA, ET AL.
-
- 91-1014 LACHTERMAN, MICHAEL V. MISSOURI
-
- 91-1125 ARNOLDT, GARLAND V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1145 CAMPBELL, RON V. DONDERO, THALIA, ET AL.
-
- 91-1161 KISER, STANLEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1177 CZARNESKI, LYNNE C. V. CIR
-
- 91-1179 ) PUEBLO OF SANTO DOMINGO V. THOMPSON, LELAND, ET AL.
- )
- 91-1346 ) UNITED STATES V. THOMPSON, LELAND, ET AL
-
- 91-1183 RICHMOND, ETC., RR COMPANY V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1193 NEW BERLIN GRADING CO. V. NLRB
-
- 91-1203 HEWLETT-PACKARD CO. V. DATAGATE, INC.
-
- 91-1209 NO. ARAPAHO & SHOSHONE ETC. V. FOUST, OLIVER J., ET AL.
-
- 91-1213 FLYNT, LARRY, ET AL. V. SPENCE, GERRY L., ET AL.
-
- 91-1217 FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL.
-
- 91-1218 FAIRCHILD, CHARLES, ET AL. V. PACIFIC MARITIME ASSN.
-
- 91-1225 MIDNIGHT SESSIONS, LTD. V. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA
-
- 91-1227 DONNER, MIRIAM V. APPLACHIAN INS., ET AL.
-
- 91-1241 SHIMOTA, JOHN, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1243 McDONALD, KENNETH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1254 PLATSIS, GEORGE V. E. F. HUTTON & CO., ET AL.
-
- 91-1259 LITTON MICROWAVE COOKING V. NLRB
-
- 91-1285 COLORADO LIBERTARIAN PARTY V. MEYER, SEC. OF STATE, COLORADO
-
- 91-1327 HOLDINESS, JAMES V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.
-
- 91-1342 CONSOL. BEEF INDUS. V. NEW YORK LIFE INS. CO.
-
- 91-1345 ASSOCIATED GEN. CONTRACTORS V. CITY & CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCO
-
- 91-1348 MADISON CABLEVISION V. MORGANTOWN, NORTH CAROLINA
-
- 91-1361 DELTA HOLDINGS, INC. V. NATIONAL DISTILLERS
-
- 91-1362 CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, ET AL. V. SIMMONS, DELORES
-
- 91-1365 WESLEY, MARIA V. PENNSYLVANIA UNEMPLOY. COMP. BD.
-
- 91-1381 BIRSNER, J. W., ET AL. V. SIVALIGNHAM, K., ET AL.
-
- 91-1390 WEST FARMS ASSOCIATES V. ST. TRAFFIC COMMN., CONNECTICUT
-
- 91-1392 HOMEBUILDERS ASSN./BUCKS CO. V. BOROUGH OF TRAPPE
-
- 91-1397 CITY OF TUKWILA V. WORLD WIDE VIDEO
-
- 91-1405 OPTIMAL DATA CORP. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1407 WHITE BUFFALO CONSTR. V. J. ARLIE BRYANT, INC.
-
- 91-1408 CHAGALL, DAVID V. SOBEL, BARRY
-
- 91-1409 HERMAN, WARDEN V. PAGE, CHARLES
-
- 91-1411 WHOLESALE FOOD LOCAL 63 V. BENDER, JAMES, ET AL.
-
- 91-1413 THOMPSON, EDDIE V. CITY OF COVINGTON, ET AL.
-
- 91-1414 EVONUK, NORMAN V. SHEKELL, SUSAN, ET AL.
-
- 91-1448 PUTKA, ANDREW V. FIRST CATHOLIC SLOVAK UNION
-
- 91-1453 HOANG, LIEU B. V. SIMS, STEPHEN M., ET AL.
-
- 91-1454 VILLA MARINA YACHT, ET AL. V. HATTERAS YACHT, ET AL.
-
- 91-1457 PIOTROWSKI, BERNIE, ET AL. V. CITY OF CHICAGO
-
- 91-1465 PATEL, MANOJ V. MILGRAM, ROBERT
-
- 91-1466 MIRABAL, RICHARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1468 GRABLE, LESLIE, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1476 REBER, CYNTHIA, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1477 NORTH, K. E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-1488 RUSS, JEFFREY, ET UX. V. INTL. PAPER CO.
-
- 91-1500 SHRIVER, GLENN V. GAF CORP.
-
- 91-1508 MARKET/MEDIA RESEARCH, INC. V. CUYAHOGA CTY. CT., ET AL.
-
- 91-5025 RIVERA-FELICIANO, ANGEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6465 HILLING, DAVEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6524 CAREY, ROBIN L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6560 COX, BENJAMIN F. V. ALABAMA
-
- 91-6616 SAMUELS, DENNIS D. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6659 KINDER, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6709 SHEPHERD, TYRONE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6717 BENAVIDES, EDUARDO M. V. DIAZ, J., ET AL.
-
- 91-6775 BERKI, JOSEPH O. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6988 CURRY, TROY W. V. LOCKHART, DIR., ARKANSAS DOC
-
- 91-6997 ALDRIDGE, RULFORD G. V. USDC ED TEXAS
-
- 91-7015 FAULS, DOUGLAS W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7025 RANDLE, JUADON V. KENTUCKY
-
- 91-7054 TAYLOR, GEORGE V. WHITLEY, WARDEN
-
- 91-7072 SALAMI, EMMANUEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7081 REESE, FRANCIS O. V. FULCOMER, DEP. COMMR.
-
- 91-7113 BICKETT, JAMES C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7128 MARTIN, FREDERICK N. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7143 THOMAS, CALVIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7159 MICKLE, DENNY V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-7174 PAYNE, LLOYD C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7185 JEFFRESS, JESSE W. V. GOLDBERG, COMMR., IRS, ET AL.
-
- 91-7188 SHORT, RANDOLPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7197 LUCAS, ELAYNE C. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7244 FAULKNER, ARTHUR V. PENNSYLVANIA
-
- 91-7302 TUGGLE, LEM D. V. BAIR, WARDEN
-
- 91-7320 CALDWELL, BEULAH V. DRISCOLL, DONALD, ET AL.
-
- 91-7326 TAYLOR, RICHARD V. WASHINGTON
-
- 91-7327 AGOMO, IKECHUKU O. V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- 91-7333 CIDLOWSKI, WALTER A. V. OFFICE OF THE SEC. OF ST., CA
-
- 91-7336 JONES, DONALD C. V. DEPT. STORE EMPLOYEES, ET AL.
-
- 91-7339 GREEN, JAMES E. V. JONES, JIMMY, ET AL.
-
- 91-7345 RANKINS, WALTER J. V. WEISENBURGER, PAUL
-
- 91-7347 SKELTON, JERRY V. PRI-COR, INC.
-
- 91-7350 BROWN, ERIC K. V. STAINER, WARDEN
-
- 91-7354 MOLINA, MARTIN V. STRICKRATH
-
- 91-7355 LARNER, JOHN F. V. WYMAN, RITA K.
-
- 91-7360 YATES, DANNY V. McMACKIN, WARDEN
-
- 91-7366 JOHNSON, OSCAR V. DERWINSKI, SEC. OF VA
-
- 91-7371 CRAWFORD, CURTIS E. V. D.C. BOARD OF PAROLE
-
- 91-7378 PATTERSON, JAMES T. V. BUTLER, C. L., ET AL.
-
- 91-7379 BRENNAN, FRANK V. SINGLETARY, DIR., FLORIDA DOC
-
- 91-7380 CALDWELL, JEFFREY V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7383 WILLIAMS, GEORGE V. LOUISIANA STATE PENITENTIARY
-
- 91-7384 DOERR, DONALD W. V. EMERSON, DANIEL
-
- 91-7392 DOMBY, IMRE V. UNITED STATES, ET AL.
-
- 91-7395 HUCKLEBERRY, JOHN F. V. GUNTER, EXECUTIVE DIR.
-
- 91-7398 CARSON, ARTHUR W. V. PETERSON, J., ET AL.
-
- 91-7400 FUNKHOUSER, KENNETH L. V. SAFFLE, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7401 HERBAGE, ALEX W. V. CARLSON, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7404 NANCY B. V. CHARLOTTE M.
-
- 91-7406 CURTIS, CAROL O. V. CURTIS, RALPH R., ET AL.
-
- 91-7410 LOCK, KIMBERLY V. INDIANA
-
- 91-7411 REES, JONATHAN R. V. REYES, BLANCA L.
-
- 91-7412 RAMSEY, GEORGE V. ARMONTROUT, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7413 MALUMPHY, TIMOTHY L. V. ARIZONA
-
- 91-7414 PRUNTY, ROBERT E. V. BAKER, DENNIS, ET AL.
-
- 91-7416 McCULLOUGH, KENNETH W. V. KERSH, FNU, ET AL.
-
- 91-7417 BALL, DONALD B. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7419 McCULLOUGH, KENNETH W. V. COLLINS, DIR. TEXAS, DCJ
-
- 91-7420 SHACKELFORD, DALE V. ARMONTROUT, WARDEN
-
- 91-7421 WESTBROOK, JAMES T. V. CITY OF LOS ANGELES, ET AL.
-
- 91-7423 KERR, ROBERT J. V. CALIFORNIA
-
- 91-7424 GIBBS, TERRY L. V. CLEMENTS FOOD COMPANY
-
- 91-7432 SIMMONS, KENNETH V. SIMMONS, THELMA, ET AL.
-
- 91-7434 SNYDER, ROBERT M. V. ARMONTROUT, WARDEN
-
- 91-7435 SMITH, JAMES E. V. BUNNELL, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7438 DE NARDO, DANIEL V. ANCHORAGE
-
- 91-7441 STEPHEN, EILEEN, ET AL. V. CALIFORNIA ST. BANK, ET AL.
-
- 91-7442 GRANT, LAWRENCE V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-7443 JOHNSON, MICHAEL C. V. SINGLETARY, SEC. FLORIDA DOC
-
- 91-7444 HOLLIS, WILLIAM B. V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7445 DUNN, RANDY G. V. MISSOURI
-
- 91-7446 STANLEY, ALEC W. V. RED RIVER FED. CREDIT UNION
-
- 91-7447 VERTIN, DENNIS L. V. OVERTON, WARDEN
-
- 91-7453 WRENN, PETER V. CLARK, MARGUERITE
-
- 91-7455 SOLIS, ARTURO V. TEXAS
-
- 91-7456 ROMULUS, STANLEY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7457 WILLIAMS, IRENE V. UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI
-
- 91-7474 JOHNSON, RICHARD V. SOUTH CAROLINA
-
- 91-7480 ELFREEZE, ELBERT L. V. NEAL, WARDEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-7495 ROMERO, JONATHAN P. V. CALDWELL, JOSEPH, ET AL.
-
- 91-7496 MABERY, FRED V. RODRIGUEZ, RAMON, ET AL.
-
- 91-7498 LaSALLE, RAMON V. WARDEN, OSSINING FACILITY
-
- 91-7509 BALSAMO, JOHN G. V. MAZURKIEWICZ, SUPT.
-
- 91-7514 PARKER, ALVIN V. OKLAHOMA CITY POLICE DEPT.
-
- 91-7515 POPE, DANIEL L. V. WASHINGTON
-
- 91-7524 FRANCOIS, LEVELT V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7532 MEYER, OSCAR A. V. MEYER, ANNA D.
-
- 91-7533 ) MERRIMAN, ANTHONY, ET AL. V. BOSSIER SHERIFF'S DEPT.
- )
- 91-7535 ) SHUBBIE, MILTON L., ET AL. V. LOUISIANA
-
- 91-7547 VAN WOUNDENBERG, SAMMY V. OKLAHOMA
-
- 91-7549 PASCHAL, WILLIE J. V. LAMBDIN, SUPT.
-
- 91-7554 HUGHES, CHRISTOPHER L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7577 DONNELLY, JAMES T. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7584 CURTIUS, ROBERT W. V. MSPB
-
- 91-7587 HAYES, RICHARD V. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7590 CUERVO, ALEJANDRO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7591 BROWN, DARRON A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7592 HENSHAW, REBECCA L. V. INS
-
- 91-7594 WATSON, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7596 KOONCE, STEPHAN G. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7605 ABREU, RAMON A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7606 WILSON, LARRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7608 MEYERS, NORMAN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7609 MARTINEZ, MIGUEL V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7613 GOLDSTEIN, ROBIN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7615 CASTRO, DOMINGO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7617 CAMPAGNA, RALPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7623 JACKSON, TRACY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7627 BURDINE, CURTIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7628 EICOFF, MITCHELL J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7631 AUDINOT, JORGE L., ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7633 DELGADO, GABRIEL A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7637 DAVENPORT, BRUCE A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7639 WHARTON, DONALD V. CITY OF VENUS, ET AL.
-
- 91-7642 BAGGULEY, DAVID F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7643 LANGSTON, RAY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7644 MINNICK, WAYNE W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7645 MOLINA-CUARTAS, LUIS V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7646 RAGONESE, LOUIS J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7647 McINTOSH, JERRY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7648 ANDERSON, FREDERICK M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7649 BUSTAMENTE, ZALENTO A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7650 LOPEZ, HUMBERTO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7651 MATEO, JOHN M. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7655 LLOYD, JOHNNIE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7661 REED, THOMAS J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7662 HALFORD, TONY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7664 TUCKER, DANNY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7667 CHRISTOFFEL, DAVID V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7668 TOLLIVER, LEONARD V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7680 COX, JOSEPH V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7682 RIVERA, JULIO V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7685 CONNOR, ALFATIR Y. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7691 FLYNN, JOHN V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7692 KING, MARCUS R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7696 CLARK, JAMES E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7698 ELLIOTT, DONALD R. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7711 BURSON, CECIL L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7717 BAKER, JULIE A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7720 DELEGAL, RODNEY F. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7721 NEWBERT, ROBERT J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7722 LAWRENCE, ALROY J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7723 MACKEY, EUGENE V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7743 HENRY, STANLEY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7744 YANT, CLYDE E. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7745 DeFUSCO, DAVID A. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-7746 CHASMER, THOMAS V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- 91-569 WASHINGTON, ET AL. V. CONFEDERATED TRIBES, ET AL.
-
- 91-6385 ST. GERMAINE, STEVEN V. CIRCUIT CT. VILAS CTY.
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice White and Justice O'Connor would grant
-
- certiorari.
-
- 91-859 U.S. DEPT. OF COMMERCE V. MONTANA, ET AL.
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari before
-
- judgment is denied.
-
- 91-1136 RAUTENBERG, ERWIN, ET AL. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The motion of petitioners for leave to file an
-
- unredacted petition for a writ of certiorari under seal
-
- is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for
-
- leave to file a brief in opposition initially under seal
-
- and to lift seal on brief in opposition and on the prior
-
- filing is granted. The motion of petitioners for leave
-
- to file a reply brief and addendum to reply brief under
-
- seal is granted and the seal is lifted. The motion of
-
- petitioners to file motion to take judicial notice under
-
- seal is granted. The seal is lifted and the motion to
-
- take judicial notice is granted. The petition for a writ
-
- of certiorari is denied.
-
- 91-1221 UNITED STATES V. KOONCE, STEPHAN G.
-
- 91-1239 TEXAS V. COOK, KERRY
-
- 91-1289 OHIO V. MILLER, DAVID S.
-
- 91-1316 COLORADO V. MARCELLUS, LAWRENCE A.
-
- 91-1351 ARIZONA V. TAYLOR, DAVID L.
-
- The motions of respondents for leave to proceed in
-
- forma pauperis are granted. The petitions for writs of
-
- certiorari are denied.
-
- 91-1356 BENFIELD, BOBBY V. SAUL, FRANCIS, ET AL.
-
- 91-1530 BRADLEY, JAMES, ET UX. V. E. I. du PONT de NEMOURS
-
- The petitions for writs of certiorari are denied.
-
- Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of these petitions.
-
- 91-1458 WHEELER, EVA V. BLDG. GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice Thomas took no part in the consideration or
-
- decision of this petition.
-
- 91-7179 SCOTT, CHARLES W. V. UNITED STATES
-
- The petition for a writ of certiorari is denied.
-
- Justice White would grant certiorari.
- MANDAMUS DENIED
-
- 91-7052 IN RE ALAN B. DAVIS
-
- 91-7117 IN RE GRANT ANDERSON
-
- 91-7263 IN RE RONALD W. JARVI
-
- 91-7264 IN RE RONALD W. JARVI
-
- 91-7452 IN RE OTTO A. PREUSS
-
- 91-7517 IN RE ALPHONZO HARRISON
-
- 91-7626 IN RE CURTIS BURDINE
-
- The petitions for writs of mandamus are denied.
-
- 91-7006 IN RE MICHAEL K. ELLIOTT
-
- The petition for writ of mandamus and/or
-
- prohibition is denied.
-
-
-
- REHEARINGS DENIED
-
-
- 91-898 IN RE MARTIN WELT
-
- 91-1096 COBIN, EMOGENE, ET AL. V. CASTLEBERRY, JAMES, ET AL.
-
- 91-6267 BARNES, IMOGENE V. FIRST NATL. BANK, ET AL.
-
- 91-6296 JACOBS, RICHARD V. SUPREME COURT OF MISSOURI
-
- 91-6361 GIBSON, EXZAVIOUS L. V. GEORGIA
-
- 91-6377 ) WILLIAMS, LARRY V. UNITED STATES
- )
- 91-6455 ) WILLIAMS, LARRY V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6541 WILLIAMS, ALEXANDER E. V. GEORGIA
-
- 91-6603 O'CONNOR, DENNIS, ET UX. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6621 BRANCH, TOMMY L. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6630 BLEGEN, PAUL V. UNITED TRUCK MAINT., ET AL.
-
- 91-6639 CULLUM, LARRY J. V. UNITED STATES
-
- 91-6640 BROWN, STEVEN V. ILLINOIS
-
- 91-6674 YOUNG, DAVID V. FLORIDA
-
- 91-6741 JONES, WILLIE V. PUCKETT, WARDEN
-
- 91-6747 MORRIS, WILLIE V. UNIV. OF ARKANSAS, ET AL.
-
- 91-6755 PECORARO, JOHN V. ILLINOIS
-
- 91-6813 JOHNSON, VALENTINE V. MICHIGAN
-
- 91-6818 COLEMAN, TRENT V. KOPF, EARL, ET AL.
-
- 91-6821 IN RE GRANT ANDERSON
-
- 91-6852 FITZGERALD, EDWARD B. V. THOMPSON, WARDEN
-
- 91-6907 MILLER, SAMUEL C. V. DIGGS, D. LESTER
-
- 91-6920 LAUREANO, PEDRO V. SULLIVAN, SUPT.
-
- 91-6945 BAHR, LAWRENCE D. V. DEPT. OF THE ARMY
-
- 91-6973 JACKSON, TENA L., ET AL. V. DIXON-BOOKMAN, GWEN, ET AL.
-
- 91-6981 WESLEY, JAMES H. V. REDMAN, ROBERT, ET AL.
-
- 91-6996 SHUMATE, JOSEPH V. CREASY, ROY
-
- 91-7000 SUN, JOSEPH V. FORRESTER, J. OWEN
-
- 91-7001 SWINICK, FRANCES V. NEW JERSEY
-
- 91-7019 MONTGOMERY, JERRY V. CLARK, WARDEN
-
- 91-7023 RUB, DUANE, ET AL. V. P.C.A. OF MANDAN
-
- 91-7024 RUB, DUANE, ET AL. V. ADOLPH RUB TRUST, ET AL.
-
- The petitions for rehearing are denied.
-
- 90-7628 MEGAR, ROBERT V. COLLINS, DIR., TEXAS DCJ
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice Thomas
-
- took no part in the consideration or decision of this
-
- petition.
-
- 91-6653 SALEEM, DAWUD V. 3-M COMPANY
-
- The petition for rehearing is denied. Justice
-
- Blackmun took no part in the consideration or decision
-
- of this petition.
-
-
-
- ORDER
-
- It is ordered that the call of the calendar,
-
- except for any special assignments, be suspended
-
- for the Term upon the conclusion of the arguments
-
- in the cases listed for hearing this week.
-
-
-
- RECESS ORDER
-
- The Court will take a recess from Monday, April
-
- 27, 1992 until Monday, May 4, 1992.
-
-
-
- MOTIONS FOR ADMISSION
-
- The written motions for admission of the following
-
- lawyers to the Bar of this Court are granted:
-
-